Dantest | MFinance | Google | Danev | JFW | DEV-FX   
 BABY  BOOKS  COMPUTERS  DVD  ELECTRONICS  GIFTS  HOME & GARDEN  MUSIC 
Apparel & Accessories | Amazon.com Outlet | Art.com | Beauty | Camera & Photo | Car Toys | Cell Phones | Computer & Video Games    
      
PRODUCT DETAILS
Christianity-The First Two Thousand Years

Christianity-The First Two Thousand Years

"This story is enormously unlikely." --Elaine Pagels, Professor of Religion, Princeton University

Pagels is right on the mark: what began two millennia ago as a Jewish sect has grown into the most widespread religion in history, despite unbridled oppression in its early years and countless denominational splits ever since. The last few years have seen a resurgence of interest in church history, and A&E's documentary Christianity: The First Thousand Years is a splendid example of solid scholarly research meshed with entertaining production values that speaks to this interest. The result is a resource with equal appeal for the historian and the theologian alike.

The issues that confronted the early church seem now quite strange since there are 2,000 years of tradition behind them today:

  • Should gentile converts to the Jesus movement have to adhere to the laws of kashrut?
  • What authority did Paul have as an apostle though he never personally knew Jesus?
  • What is Jesus' relationship to God?
  • How can a tripartite Christian theology be resolved with Judaism's strong tradition of monotheism?
  • Which texts should form the Christian scripture?
  • What relationship do the apostolic bishops at Jerusalem, Damascus, Rome, Constantinople, and elsewhere have to each other--and how should the church be structured?
  • What should be the central statement of faith of Christians?
Most of these issues were solved at the Council of Nicaea and at other early church councils--though authority of the papacy at Rome is a persistent divider both between the Eastern and Western churches and between Protestantism and Roman Catholicism. Christianity: The First Thousand Years provides background and the original perspectives that led to the East-West split--a split whose basis we hardly question today.

The rapid spread of the church from the controversial conversion of Constantine to the conquests of Otto is tied closely to the history of the Roman Empire itself. Without the empire as its catapult, it is unlikely that Christianity would have spread even to remote Iceland and Finland by the year 1000. The early church modeled itself structurally on imperial institutions, and it integrated itself into the fabric of imperial life. Indeed, the central role of Christianity in Byzantine life is one of numerous often-overlooked but fascinating historical perspectives that A&E manages to cover here.

The four-part set features Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee, whose unusual but pleasant voices will be well known to viewers of A&E's TV series Mysteries of the Bible. Like the TV series, Christianity: The First Thousand Years is marked by thorough scholarship, including interviews with many highly regarded scholars such as Pagels. Snippets of these interviews are interspersed with photography from the Holy Land and some reenactments, leading to an informative and revealing exploration of the early church. --Erik J. Macki
Manufacturer: A&E Home Video


Price Range: $15.12 - $39.95


Christianity-The First Two Thousand Years
User Reviews
Not a reliable source
rating: 2

Visually and musically the film is very well done but I did not make it past the first 30 minutes. Below is a list of the errors the film made in the first 20 minutes.

1. The narrator said that Jesus was killed for treason against Rome.
Anyone who has ever read the New Testament or even one of the Gospels should know how wrong that statement is. Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, the Jews thought that claim was blasphemy so they brought Him to Pilate (a Roman Governor) to have Him crucified. Jesus did not commit treason against Rome. I don't know where anyone would get that idea.

2. The film starts out saying that Peter was the leader of the early Church, 5 minutes later they argue that James was the actual leader. The verse the narrator quotes is Galatians 1:19 to support that James was the leader. Yet if anyone reads the verse in context they would see how twisted it is to use that verse to support James as the early Church leader. Galatians 1:18 (one verse before) Paul says "Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas [which is Peter's Aramaic name] and remained with him fifteen days." Yet the only verse the narrator reads is verse 19 which says "But I saw none of the other apostles except James, the Lord's brother (in what I am writing to you, before God, I do not lie)." I'm sorry but that doesn't prove or say that James was THE early church leader. In fact Jesus said to Peter in Matthew 16:18 "You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church." Peter means rock so I think that means Peter was going to be the early church leader which is made evident in the beginning of acts, such as Pentecost.

3. The narrator says that after Christ died, Christianity struggled to find a new leader, which is something that will trouble the Christian faith for the next 2000 years.

4. The film makes it sound like the early Christians thought they were actually drinking the real blood and flesh of Christ when they partook in communion.
The wine and the bread resembled Christ blood and body but they didn't think it was his actual blood. During the last supper with the disciples, Jesus said to have communion in remembrance of him, but they obviously didn't think it was his actual blood and flesh while he was at the table so I'm sure they didn't think that after he departed. Though Catholics might disagree with me on that.

5. Around 18 minutes into the movie, the narrator said that Paul was struck blind by his fall to the ground.
Paul went blind temporally when Christ came to him. Paul did fall to the ground but it was the radiance and glory of Christ that made Paul lose his sight temporarily.

6. Around 19 minutes into the movie the film says that Paul's apostleship was in question by the other apostles.
Read Galatians or Acts and you will think otherwise.

One or two of the people interviewed in the first 30 minutes are biblical and historical scholars, the rest are skeptics that are not very thoughtful, do not know the Bible well and give inaccurate and misleading information. If the narrator of the film says in the first couple minutes that Jesus was killed for treason against Rome, I mean if the narrator doesn't even know the most basic reason why Jesus was crucified, which was the climax of Biblical redemptive history, I doubt the film is going to be a very accurate source.


Good Exposure
rating: 5

I've always been interested in history but never read about Christian history except tangentially. These dvds provide a decent chronology especially as to the first 1000 years and they provide important details I was not aware of: St. Ignatius returned to school with adolescents to learn Latin, etc., so as to be allowed to preach; Nicea was prompted by Constantine's desire to publish 50 collections of what today we call the Bible; Pope Gregory enforced a very unpopular decree that (married) priests must be celibate; etc. Well worth the time.
Louis J Sheehan


good pre-modern history of christianity
rating: 4

This was overall a good video on the historical development of Christianity (pre-20th century). The part on
Christianity in the 20th century was very weak.


really good, not great
rating: 4

I learned a great deal of history through the 400 minutes of video in this series, and I thought I already knew a lot! I liked it overall and I think it's something that everyone should watch. My only complaints were that there are a couple of times that they weren't completely accurate, or mispresented something, such as making it seem like the canonization of the books of the Holy Bible were done hastily at the demand of an Emperor.

I also wish that there were more acted out scenes. Through most of the video you're looking at artwork or scenery, and it's not always pictures of what they're talking about, which was weird.

Still... my rating is a 4 because I think it was really good, just could've been better.


Interesting
rating: 4

It was nice to watch an objective look at the first 2 millenia of Christianity. There are no punches pulled here. There is no glorification of the religion; it is an honest look at the largest religion in the world, from its beginning to current day. It does not make Christianity look bad, nor does it make it look good. If you are looking for an unbiased look at the history of the church, buy this.




Christianity-The First Two Thousand Years









Copyright © 1999-2004 DEV-FX Techs. All Rights Reserved.  07th of September 2008